Accident On Qe2 Bridge Today, Woga Gymnastics Meet 2022, 5 Letter Word Second Letter O Last Letter E, When To Euthanize A Horse With Navicular, Articles W

34 talking about this. What the Bleep Do We Know!? You'll even applaud the wedding Polka scene there's just not enough Eastern European folk culture in contemporary film. I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. It was the biggest bunch of garbage that I had ever seen. That would be, very hard to quantify:). Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. Hard to get your head around What the Bleep Do We Know. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. It is just a movie. But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. It's there. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. improve functionality and performance. I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. By 1984 he had moved to Maharishi University and started building up the physics department there. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! We [18] A BBC reviewer described it as "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. " " what the bleep do we know ( 2 ) Full HD 2 . I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. (Refugees in Sudan or people in Baghdad would have an even tougher time accepting the film's premise.). While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . The Christian Science Monitor has expired. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. But no scientific discovery has proved so ripe for spiritual projection as the theories of quantum physics, replete with their quixotic qualities of uncertainty, simultaneity and parallelism." By continuing to browse the site And a lot of people talk about quantum consciousness that even if the everyday world we see is not a system that can be changed, our consciousness about the world can be changed. "[20], Journalist John Gorenfeld, writing in Salon, notes that the film's three directors are students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment, which he says has been described as a cult. What the Bleep Do We Know!? It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. You can't change the world by thinking about it. Featuring two (!) We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. The host of the show said this was done because it was negative But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. If you wanted to study the impact of spoken, drawn or written sentiments on the formation of crystals in freezing water, you'd have to do a slightly more rigorous study. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. 7. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. What the #$*! And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. With Alejandro Jodorowsky, Horacio Salinas, Zamira Saunders, Juan Ferrara. I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . Fred Allen Wolf The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. He has however just released his third book of pretty crystal pictures. While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. 3. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor But Hagelin's use of the term "achieved" for the drop in crime is a bit strong. With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. Q: You do see that in some science . Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. Your session to The Christian Presentations ranging from "The Secret" to "What the Bleep Do We Know?" That's not the case. ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. But quantum mechanics, for better or worse, doesn't bring any more spiritual benefits than gravity does. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. Quantum mechanics is crazy, but it's just crazy enough to make the world still be sensible at a macroscopic level, the level that we experience. That's not always true, but it's often true. VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. Those are two places where the quantum world leaks into the classical world. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. The observer can't be ignored." Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. It was clearly time to check the facts for myself. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. Has this experiment been replicated or verified? They want suggestions, not formulas. DO WE KNOW? The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. Sol. Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. Evidently Albert claims he was taken advantage of, that his interview was heavily edited to misrepresent his views. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". Check my single page unpublishable http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf. We might be able to create quantum computers, for example, that will simultaneously do many different calculations at once, because the quantum world is capable of doing many things at the same time. A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. I'm always up for a good New Age flick, even one masquerading as a documentary. was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". So far, so good. The quantum world is intriguing, but unless you're a particle physicist it's got very little to do with the world's reality. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . Miceal Ledwith That's what makes the world so interesting. Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. The brain processes 400 billion bits of information a second but we're only aware of 2000 of these but our awareness of those 2000 bits of information are just about the environment, our body and about time. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. The web makes all such things available today, so I can give you a Google link to a page about Maharishis unified field theory, http://www.worldpeaceendowment.org/invincibility/invincibility6.html. We may be able to use quantum communication in ways that we haven't done before. That matter is not solid, and electrons are able to pop in and out of existence without it being known where they disappear to. In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. ", "What the Bleep Do We Know!? "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. The brain wasn't born yesterday. "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? [5] Author Barrie Dolnick adds that "people don't want to learn how to do one thing. Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. A movie and a book said that water molecules are. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. We're not using either superconductivity or superfluidity yet on the scale that I think people thought we might. Wertheim continues that the film "abandons itself entirely to the ecstasies of quantum mysticism, finding in this aleatory description of nature the key to spiritual transformation. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? The debate here is that we'll be able to use quantum mechanics to break codes, in particular to determine the big prime numbers that are at the basis of the security of your credit cards and your bank cards. Our work isn't possible without your support. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. We will write a custom Essay on Philosophy Meaning of Arntz's Movie "What the Bleep Do We Know" specifically for you. Both are indeed mysterious, and their genuine mystery needs none of the hype with which this film relentlessly and noisily belabours us", concluding that the film is "tosh". . That's why we experience a classical world. Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. We want to bridge divides to reach everyone. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. (stylized as What t #$*! Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. This will be revisited if any. Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. and published a study guide. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? For many years in the early-mid-eighties, the Maharishi was pushing N=8 supergravity as the unified field theory, I remember a colorful poster explaining how it agreed exactly with his philosophy that many people posted on their walls. Some lost their entire life savings. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. This has led to accusations, both formal and informal, directed towards the film's proponents, of spamming online message boards and forums with many thinly veiled promotional posts. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. [12][13] Lisa Randall refers to the film as "the bane of scientists". When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. Andrew B Newberg, (MD, Radiologist), in What the Bleep Do We Know? It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. It was really hard to sit through. The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. Nasa found something. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. Beyond fear, beyond anger. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. for only $16.05 $11/page. What the Bleep Do We Know? And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3. and What the #$*! Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. A: Of course it does. This message will appear once per week Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. . "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. In the late eighties I remember seeing Maharishi University preprints, perhaps about flipped SU(5). Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). does a reasonable job of presenting some of these quandaries, researchers say. With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. [12], Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. I want to mention another point Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. A: Absolutely. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality.